In the present study, the issue of examining the evidence and the manner of litigation in The Hague Tribunal was written with emphasis on Iranian litigation. The main cases of the Iranian government in this court have been against the US government.
In this regard, the subject was studied and written in a descriptive-analytical method. In general, what are the proofs of the lawsuit presented in The Hague court in the lawsuits of Iran and the United States? What is the procedure for proving the evidence in the lawsuits of Iran and the United States in The Hague? What coherent procedure is there for possible litigation in the International Court of Justice?
In general, with the contents mentioned in this study, it is concluded that in Iranian lawsuits in The Hague, international laws and regulations, jurisprudence and court science are the most important evidence to prove the lawsuits in Iran-US lawsuits. Also, the procedure for resolving Iran-US lawsuits is subject to the procedure of the International Court of Justice, which has been completed and enumerated in the Statute of the Court, which has been completed and enumerated by the Permanent Court of Justice since 1922. The rulings in The Hague Tribunal were clarified and examined. It was found that the disputes between the Iranian government and the United States are beyond international law and the use of new compromise methods in this case is the best legal solution with regard to the judicial aspects of the dispute and America